(this post on NROL-71 is belated, as I was in hospital around the original launch date. Luckily, launch got postponed)
click map to enlarge |
If nothing ontowards happens, the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) will launch NROL-71, a Delta IV-Heavy with a classified payload, from Vandenberg SLC-6 on
The new launch date will not be before 30 December 2018.
The launch was postponed three times. Originally to be launched on December 8, a communications problem aborted that launch. A renewed launch attempt the next day, was aborted only 7.5 seconds before lift-off because of a technical issue (see the video below).
A new launch attempt will take place on
NROL-71 is an odd launch. When the Maritime Broadcast Warnings for the launch came out and revealed the launch hazard areas, they contained a big surprise. The general expectation among analysts was that NROL-71 was the first of the Block V new generation KH-11 ADVANCED CRYSTAL electro-optical reconnaissance satellites. As such we expected it to go in a sun-synchronous, 97.9 degree inclined, 265 x 1000 km orbit.
But the Maritime Broadcast Warnings suggest this is NOT the case. The hazard areas are incompatible with such a sun-synchronous polar orbit. Instead, they point to a (non-sunsynchronous!) 74-75 degree inclined orbit. Not what you expect for an optical reconnaissance satellite!
The map below shows the three hazard zones. Two are directly downrange from the launch site, where the strap-on boosters and first stage splash down. The third area is the upper stage deorbit area (which is remarkably small in size), located northeast of Hawaii, with deorbit occuring near the end of the first revolution (as usual).
click map to enlarge |
The trajectory depicted by the dashed line on the map is for a 74-degree inclined, 265 x 455 km orbit. Higher inclined orbits would miss the downrange splashdown zones and the upper stage deorbit area.
Ted Molczan has pointed out that the shift in launch time with each launch delay, points to a specific orbital plane and a specific aim for the rate of precession of the RAAN of -2.27 deg/day.
This is over twice as fast as the RAAN precession of the KH-11 currently in orbit (0.98 deg/day, i.e. sun-synchronous).
This value for the RAAN precession apparently aimed for, puts further constraints on the orbit as in combination with the 74-degree inclination deduced from the location of the Launch Hazard areas it points to a semi-major axis of about 6735 km.
Going from the notion of KH-11-like orbital altitudes, the current typical KH-11 perigee near 265 km would then result in an apogee near 455 km. This is somewhat similar to the orbital altitude of the oldest of the KH-11 on orbit, USA 186 in the secondary West plane, which was in a 262 x 443 km orbit when we last observed it early October (it currently is invisible due to the winter blackout). This apogee would be much lower than that of the two KH-11 payloads in the primary planes, which have apogee near 1000 km, i.e. twice as high, another deviation from expectations. Normally, KH-11 are launched into a primary plane and about 265 x 1000 km orbit, and only after some years, when the payload is moved to a secondary plane (and a new payload is launched into the primary plane), is apogee lowered to ~450 km (see an earlier post here).
So, if NROL-71 is a new electro-optical reconnaissance satellite in the KH-11 series, it represents a serious deviation from past KH-11 missions. The apparent abandoning of a sun-synchronous polar orbit, is surprising, as such orbits are almost synonymous with Earth Reconnaissance. The "why" of a 74-degree orbit is mystifying too. If it does go into a 74-degree inclined orbit, it doesn't seem to be a "Multi-Sun-Synchonous-Orbit".
Alternatives have been proposed. Ted Molczan has for example suggested that, perhaps, NROL-71 could be a reincarnation of the Misty stealth satellites, warning that the unexpected orbital inclination for NROL-71 might not be the only surprise.
I myself was struck by the fact that 74-degree orbital inclination is the prograde complementary of the retrograde 106 degree inclination of the FIA Radar/TOPAZ 6 payload (USA 281, 2018-005A) launched early this year: note that 180-106 = 74. FIA Radar 6 was the first in a new block of TOPAZ radar payloads, just like NROL-71 appears to be the first in a new block of 'something'.
The previous four FIA Radars, launched into 123-degree inclined orbits, were the retrograde complementary in inclination of the prograde 57-degree Lacrosse 5 orbit, another radar satellite. The complementary character of 106-degree versus 74-degree for NROL-71, could perhaps point to NROL-71 being a Lacrosse Follow-On, as a complementary to the newest FIA block.
If NROL-71 is a Lacrosse Follow-On, its orbital altitude and brightness behavious might yield clues: Lacrosse 5 has shown a very distinct brightness behaviour.
It will be very interesting to chase this launch. If launch occurs on 19 December near 1:57 UT and weather cooperates, Europe will have visible evening twilight passes in the first few days.
Below are a couple of search orbits. All are for an assumed 74-degree orbital inclination
Orbit #70003 fits the hazard areas from the Maritime Broadcast Warnings best.
1 70001U 18999A 18355.06319444 .00000000 00000-0 00000-0 0 00
2 70001 074.0000 184.7636 0524203 155.2439 326.4145 14.78994708 03
NROL-71 265 x 500 km
1 70002U 18999A 18355.06319444 .00000000 00000-0 00000-0 0 01
2 70002 074.0000 184.7636 0173800 155.2439 324.5345 15.61785606 06
NROL-71 265 x 455 km
1 70003U 18999A 18355.06319444 .00000000 00000-0 00000-0 0 02
2 70003 074.0000 184.7636 0140989 155.2439 324.3567 15.69614809 07
NROL-71 715 x 725 km
1 70004U 18999A 18355.06319444 .00000000 00000-0 00000-0 0 03
2 70004 074.0000 184.8196 0007044 155.2265 327.0336 14.51731413 06
Note that deviations of many minutes in pass time and several degrees deviation in cross-track are possible on all four orbits, certainly several revolutions after launch.
5 comments:
NROL-71 MSSO calculated for intended target area. launch time + on orbit calculus = EMEA
2.5 Meter aperture indicates a 10-15 cm acuity at perigee of aprox 270km.
Stand by for additional data post launch longitudinal target area calc.
Hope your hospital stay wasn't too bad, and that all is well now.
Best,
-KW
Thanks Kevin! I had a bad case of pneumonia. It is never pleasant to be in hospital on an oxygen feed for several days, but the care by the hospital staff was excellent.
The infection is gone now, but I have lost several kg in weight and still am low in energy. But things are improving rapidly, so by January 2019 I will probably be back at my old level.
Excellent news!
Just FYI - there is a great pneumococcal vaccine that does wonders but that typically isn't offered to healthy people below age 65 or 70, unless you have a particular known susceptibility. Doctors just don't think to prescribe it, so, for me, I had to twist my doctor's arm to get one (I'm not a smoker, and I haven't been hospitalized for a lung infection). Since then, I haven't suffered from what was becoming my typical December cough (would drag on for weeks, but wouldn't rise to the level of antibiotics), and there have been no adverse side effects. I also haven't been struck by the flu or even the common cold since the shot - I think its effects help keep your general immunity strong.
You may have already been prescribed the vaccine, given that you had to endure a hospital stay. If not, I highly recommend considering it for the future. It lasts for ~5 years, so it's not an annual hit like the flu shot. Your doc will know how long to wait (if at all) before you can get the shot - I don't think its best to inject while your body is still recovering.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/pneumo/index.html
:)
Nice Information, Please Visit My Blog https://pesan-iseng.blogspot.com
Post a Comment