New attempt to launch the Crew Dragon on May 30: trajectory

screenshot from the May 27 live webcast

In an earlier post I discussed the SpaceX Crew Dragon Demo-2 launch. Originally slated for 27 May, it was postponed (with the astronauts already seated on board) because of bad weather: Tropical Storm Bertha more north on the US coast was the main culprit.

The new launch attempt will be on May 30 at about 19:22:45 UT (the subminute time comes from Spaceflight Now, not from an official SpaceX or NASA source, so is apocryphal). If that launch is scrapped to, the third backup date is May 31 near 18:59 UT.

As things currently (29 May 21:00 UT) stand, weather prospects are not that good for both these dates either, with currently a 50% chance of a weather violation on the 30th and 40% on the 31st: so perhaps we will see a scrub again.

Click map to enlarge

But in case the launch does happen on 30 May, the map above is the trajectory the Crew Dragon will fly on its first revolution (times on the map are in UT).

Some 23 minutes after launch, the Crew Dragon will pass over Europe, along this trajectory (times are inUT: add one hour to get BST and 2 hours to get CEST):

Click map to enlarge

Note the location of the day/night terminator...only eastern and southeastern Europe has sufficiently dark skies at that moment.

The launch time has shifted considerably forward compared to the May 27 original launch date, by about 1h 10m. As a result, the pass is no longer favourable for NW Europa, as the pass will be before sunset for the UK, and around sunset for coastal Europe.

Only longitudes east of say longitude 13 deg E will have a sufficiently dark sky to see it on the first revolution, so eastern and southeast Europe will have a prime seat this time.

Coastal western Europe and the UK might have, depending on your locality, a theoretical chance to see the second pass 1.5 hours later, near 21:18 UT. For most localities, that will however be a very low elevation pass though, often at a maximum elevation of les sthan 10 degrees.

At the end of this blogpost, I will provide some sky charts for several European localities for both those localities with a chance to see something of the first pass, and those who might theoretically catch the second pass.

The reason that the launch time is 1h 10m earlier on May 30 than on May 27, is that the launch time is instantanious as it is determined by the moment that the orbital plane of the ISS passes over the launch site. This time shifts back by 23m 22s each day, as is clear from this tabel in which I calculated orbital plane crossings over LC-39A (and is visualized in the illustrations below it):

ISS plane crossing over LC-39A:
-------------------------------
Date           UT   
27 May         20:36:52
28 May         20:13:30
29 May         19:50:09
30 May         19:26:47
31 May         19:03:26
-------------------------------

You can also see in the table that the actual launch time is a few minutes before the plane crossing. This has two main reasons.

One is that what is actually of relevance is the position of the orbital plane once the rocket reaches orbital height (a few minutes after launch).

The other is that the Crew Dragon initially is inserted into a ~200 km altitude orbit, which is only half the orbital altitude of the ISS. As a result, the Precession rate of the RAAN is faster than that of the ISS: so launch has to be somewhat earlier or otherwise, over the 19 hour flight, its RAAN would overshoot rather than match that of the ISS upon arrrival at the orbital altitude of the ISS.

The reason May 28 and May 29 were not chosen as backup dates, is because of a second consideration: the ISS has to be within a certain distance window to the launch site in order for the two (Crew Dragon and ISS) to meet up after 19 hours of flight. As it happens, and I am not sure that is deliberate or just a happy coincidence, this also means that on the chosen dates, docking will happen on the night-time side of the Earth (with launch on May 28 or 29 it would have happened on the daytime-side).

Below are a number of sky maps for localities that have a dark enough sky (generally: sun no less than 5 degrees below the horizon) to see the first pass, some 25 minutes (for eastern Europe) after launch near 21:46 CEST. Note that there is a time uncertainty of about 1 minute or so.

TLE's are provided below the maps.

NOTE: if you are not near one of these localities, then Heavens-Above provides you with predictions for your custom location. Please note however that Heavens-Above predictions for the second revolution (the 23:19 CEST pass over Europe) seem to be based on the TLE for the first revolution, resulting in a time difference of about 1 minute with my predictions below.(but also realise there is an uncertainty of 1-2 minutes in the estuimated orbit anyway).

Maps for locations in NW Europe might theoretically be able to see the Crew Dragon on its second revolution, near 23:18 CEST (22:18 BST), some 2 hours after launch. But in most cases this will be very low above the horizon. Please note that the time uncertainty is 1-2 minutes at least!

Here is an estimated TLE for the first revolution:

CREW DRAGON                                      initial orbit
1 70000U 20999A   20151.80474535 -.00003603  11390-4  00000+0 0    04
2 70000  51.6423 075.0039 0122953  45.6251 315.4951 15.99554646    01


And here is an estimated TLE for the second revolution:

CREW DRAGON                                      second revolution
1 70001U 20999A   20151.93029831 -.18507952  12289+0 -23808-1 0    05
2 70001  51.6233 074.5097 0096856  46.3995 314.2887 15.95177824    03

Imaging some splendid passes of HTV-9 (Kounotori-9) and Cygnus NG-13

It are very busy times at the International Space Station. Spaceships come and go.

First, on May 11, the US cargoship Cygnus NG-13 was released from the ISS, three months after berthing to it. This cargoship had been launched on 15 February 2020 and berthed on 18 February. After its release from the ISS two weeks ago, it is currently free-flying to do experiments. It will perform a controlled reentry over the southern Pacific on 29 May.

On 20 May at 17:31 UT, the Japanese cargoship HTV-9 (Kounotori-9) was launched. It berthed to the ISS on 25 May. This provided the opportunity to see two ISS cargoships, one departing and one arriving, in the sky last week.

And it continues: we are in anticipation of the Crew Dragon Demo-2 launch, on May 27 if weather cooperates (see my previous blogpost), bringing to astronauts to the ISS.

Both Cygnus NG-13 and HTV-9 made some splendid evening passes last week. Weather was clear on most days, allowing me to observe and photograph several passes, often two on one evening. Through Twitter, I managed to get a lot of people to go out and watch the passes. HTV's are very bright and distinctly orange objects, easily visible with the naked eye even in deep twilight and from an urban environment. So they are ideal objects to get people out and watch.

HTV-9 was a spectacular sight on every pass. It reached magnitude 0 to -1, with a very distinct orange colour that is due to the orange thermal foil it is wrapped in. It was also prone to producing brief bright flares to magnitude -2 to -3. It did this on almost every pass, sometimes multiple times. here is an example, from May 21:

Click to enlarge

click to enlarge

Below are a number of photographic stacks I made during these HTV-9 passes (gaps in the trails are the brief periods between successive photographs in the stack). The first image showing another flare: the second bright satellite crossing the path of HTV-9 in the third image is Resurs P1. Note the orange colour, especially apparent in the second image. Visually, the orange colour was even more profound than in these images (where they have washed out a bit due to the brightness of the trail).

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Cygnus NG-13 was much fainter than HTV-9. During a  good pass it would reach magntude +3, but often was below naked eye visibility. Here is imagery from one of the brighter passes, on May 19 when it reached magnitude +3:

click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

The trajectory of the upcoming Crew Dragon Demo-2 launch, returning the US to crewed spaceflight

Photo: SpaceX

UPDATE: the Crew Dragon launch has been postponed to NET 30 May, 19:22 UT

Below is the original text and maps, which are however no longer valid!
New maps in a new, separate post.

If everything goes well, SpaceX and NASA will launch the Crew Dragon Demo-2 flight with astronauts Bob Behnken and Doug Hurley to the International Space Station on 27 May 2020. The launch is slated for 20:33:33 UT (note: some sources now say 20:33:31 UT), from LC-39A.

This is a historic flight, because after a 9-year hiatus it will return NASA to a crewed flight capacity. It is the first crewed flight launching from US soil on a US rocket since the Space Shuttle program ended in 2011. Over the past 9 years, US astronauts had to hitch a ride on Russian Soyuz spacecraft in order to get to space.

The Crew Dragon Demo-2 will fly this approximate flight trajectory, bringing it over Europe some 23 minutes after launch:

click map to enlarge

click map to enlarge

The times in the map above are in UT (GMT): for CEST add +2 hours; for BST add +1 hour. I created the maps using the (uncrewed) Crew Dragon Demo-1 test flight from March 2019 as a proxy.

Based on that same Crew Dragon Demo-1 flight, I estimate these orbital elements for the first orbit:


CREW DRAGON DEMO-2   
1 70000U 20999A   20148.85443285 -.00003603  11390-4  00000+0 0    03
2 70000  51.6423 089.9835 0122953  45.6251 315.4951 15.99554646    09 

estimated initial orbit for launch at 27 May 2020, 20:33:33 UT


You can use this so called TLE (for an explanation of these numeric lines click here) to make pass predictions and maps of the trajectory in your local sky for your own location, using prediction software like HeavenSat.

Be aware that it is approximate: so allow for a possible error of 1-2 minutes in the time it will pass in your sky, and a small cross-track error (I expect this latter to be less than 1 degree, i.e. less than two moon diameters).

Weather willing,  the Crew Dragon containing the astronauts and the Falcon 9 upper stage will be visible from much of Europe some 23 minutes after launch.

Northwest Europe has it pass in twilight, but Dragon's tend to be bright, so twilight should be no problem and the Dragon and Falcon 9 should be easily visible by the naked eye, except perhaps from the British Isles where it is still quite light.

I do advise using binoculars once you have located the spacecraft, as the Crew Dragon and the Falcon 9 upper stage will be close together, and with binoculars you will see them separately (you can see some photographs of a pass of a just launched Cargo-Dragon and its Falcon 9 upper stage from March this year in an earlier post here).

If you are lucky, you might even catch some small corrective thruster firings as small "puffs", like in this movie which I shot of a pass of the Dragon CRS-20 in March this year (look for the "puff" going upwards around 05:13:00 UT in the video):




(the two slowly varying objects astride the Dragon and Falcon 9 stage in the video above are the two ejected solar panel covers. The Crew Dragon does not have these, as far as I know).

The Falcon 9 upper stage will be deorbitted some 55 minutes after launch, over the southern Indian Ocean west of Australia.

photo: SpaceX

Below are my predicted sky tracks for a number of places in West and Central Europe, valid for launch on 27 May at 20:33:33 UT .

Times listed in the plots below are in local time (generally CEST, except for London which is BST). Please be aware that there is an uncertainty of about 1 to 2 minutes in the actual pass time!!! The track placement in the sky should generally be correct though. Bottom of the plots is either South or North, depending on the location (see the annotations on the plots).


Note added 25 May: the Heavens-Above webservice now provides you with custom predictions for the Crew Dragon for your observing site.

Amsterdam

Berlin

Brussels

London

Paris

Prague

Vienna

Hamburg

Lyon

Marseille

Munich

Reims

Strassbourg

[UPDATED] OTV 6 (USSF 7), the next X-37B launch, appears to go into a 44-degree inclined orbit

OTV 6.  Image: US Air Force. Click to enlarge

If weather cooperates, the next X-37B launch, mission OTV 6 ,also known as launch USSF 7, is slated for May 16, with backup dates on May 17 and 18 in case launch is postponed. The small uncrewed space plane will be launched for the US Air Force by the United Launch Alliance, with an Atlas 5 rocket, from Cape Canaveral SLC-41.

Navigational Warnings have now appeared for this launch, which shed light on the launch window and the orbit aimed for:

NAVAREA IV 388/20(GEN).
WESTERN NORTH ATLANTIC.
FLORIDA.
1. HAZARDOUS OPERATIONS, ROCKET LAUNCHING
   161224Z TO 161453Z MAY, ALTERNATE
   171314Z TO 171532Z AND 181354Z TO 181434Z MAY
   IN AREAS BOUND BY:
   A. 28-36-51N 080-35-57W, 28-41-00N 080-26-00W,
      28-36-00N 080-23-00W, 28-31-36N 080-33-34W.
   B. 32-28-00N 075-12-00W, 33-50-00N 072-51-00W,
      33-08-00N 072-17-00W, 31-45-00N 074-41-00W.
   C. 38-43-00N 062-38-00W, 40-23-00N 058-26-00W,
      39-18-00N 057-47-00W, 37-34-00N 061-56-00W.
2. CANCEL THIS MSG 181534Z MAY 20.//


HYDROPAC 1415/20(74,75).
SOUTHEASTERN INDIAN OCEAN.
DNC 03, DNC 04.
1. HAZARDOUS OPERATIONS, SPACE DEBRIS
   161319Z TO 161528Z MAY, ALTERNATE
   171409Z TO 171607Z AND 181449Z TO 181509Z MAY
   IN AREA BOUND BY
   36-03S 096-54E, 33-40S 098-30E,
   37-32S 108-22E, 40-03S 107-00E.
2. CANCEL THIS MSG 181609Z MAY 20.//


The launch azimuth defined by the three launch hazard areas A, B and C in the Atlantic Ocean and the location of the Centaur upper stage deorbit zone in the Indian Ocean, point to a launch into a ~44-degree inclined orbit, give or take half a degree. The Centaur upper stage will be deorbitted about half a revolution (55 minutes) after launch.

The following map depicts the hazard areas and the trajectory of the first orbit, for a 44-degree inclined orbit and an orbital altitude of ~350 km. The latter orbit fits the locations of the hazard zones well, and the ~55 minutes time difference between the start of the launch windows and the start of the Centaur upper stage deorbit windows in the Navigational Warnings combined with the position of the deorbit zone, fits a ~350 km altitude orbit:

Click map to enlarge

Launch into a 44-degree inclined orbit unfortunately means I do not get to track it from the Netherlands, as my observing location is too high north in latitude to see it in such an orbit. Following the previous OTV 5 launch, that went into a 54.5 degree inclined orbit and could be well observed from the Netherlands, I had some hopes for OTV 6, but alas no, it is not to be apparently...

A 44-degree orbital inclination would be similar to mission OTV 3 from 2012-2014. These are the orbital inclinations of all past OTV missions:

Mission     inclination    operational period        flight duration
OTV 1       40.0^o          22/04/2010 - 30/11/2010   224 days
OTV 2       42.8^o          05/03/2011 - 16/06/2012   468 days
OTV 3       43.5^o          25/10/2012 - 17/10/2014   675 days
OTV 4       38.0^o          20/05/2015 - 07/05/2017   718 days
OTV 5       54.5^o          07/09/2017 - 27/10/2019   780 days
OTV 6       44.0^o ?        16/05/2020 - ?

With regard to the upcoming launch, the given launch windows for May 16 and the two backup dates are curious. These launch windows are not the same duration (May 16 is 2h 29m in duration; May 17 is 2h 18m in duration; and May 18 only 40 minutes in duration).  They shift oddly from date to date too. The start of the given windows shifts 50 minutes between May 16 and 17; and shifts 40 minutes between May 17 and 18. It moreover shift to a later time between consecutive dates: while a given targetted orbital plane would make the launch shift to an earlier time, not a later time

Perhaps this is done to obfuscate the launch time and RAAN aimed for (or maybe it is just simply Range availability at play). If we look at the common ground: all three launch windows have a potential 10-degree wide RAAN window between 331^o.14 and 341^o.17 in common, so perhaps that is what is aimed for. If that interpretation is correct, this would lead to the following potential 40-minute launch windows, shifting back by 4 minutes each day:

16 May     13:58 - 14:38 UT
17 May     13:54 - 14:34 UT
18 May     13:50 - 14:30 UT

But of course, it is always possible that they launch straight away at the 12:24 UT opening of the May 16 window...we will see!

[Edit 15 May 2020 23:20 UT: but see note at end of post!]

A lot has been written about the X-37B and its purpose, and there are a lot of persistent misconceptions regarding the fact that it is a "space plane" (see my blogpost "X-37B fact and fiction" from July 2019).

Far from being a nefarious device, the X-37B appears to be a testbed for experimental space technology. According to the US Space Force, one of the things that will be tested during the next OTV 6 mission is an experiment to transmit solar power by microwave. It will also contain two NASA experiments that study the effects of radiation on materials and seeds, and it will deploy at least one military cubesat, FalconSat 8 (the previous OTV mission, OTV 5, released three cubesats).

The US Space Force Press Release also indicates that, as a first, OTV 6 will be fitted with a "service module" to the aft of the vehicle, that will house experiments (previous OTV missions housed experiments in the cargo bay). It will be interesting to see what happens to this service module at the end of the mission.

Addendum 13 May 22:05 UT:
More on the microwave experiment in this article (HT to Brian Weeden). It seems it is not so much transmission by microwave, but the generation of microwaves from solar power, which is then send through a cable, if I get it correctly. Anyway: something with microwaves...

Addendum 15 May 23:20 UT:

Bob Christy wrote a very interesting analysis on his Zarya blog, in which he links similar odd jumps in past OTV launch windows to times of close KH-11 passes, the idea being that these KH-11 satellites image the OTV after launch to see whether everything is allright. If that is correct, then this leads to four possible launch times on May 16: 12:24, 13:15, 14:06 and 14:53 UT.
My estimated elsets for these four launch times can be found here.

Addendum 18 May 13:55 UT:

OTV 6 launched on 17 May 2020 at 14:13 UT. A pre-launch estimated elset can be found here;  a preliminary radio-observation based orbit here.

Based on the preliminary radio elset, OTV 6 appears to have been inserted into a 45-degree inclined orbit at ~390 km altitude. The ground track repeats every 3 days:

click to enlarge

Here is how the launch track based on the radio orbit (red dashed line) compares to my pre-launch estimated launch track based on the locations of the hazard areas from the Navigational Warnings (blue dashed line):

click map to enlarge

The Kosmos 482 Descent Craft: imaging an old Soviet Venera probe stuck in Earth orbit

click to enlarge

 

On May 7 I imaged a pass of the Kosmos 482 Descent Craft (1972-023E), using the WATEC 902H camera and a SamYang 1.4/85 mm lens. This is a very interesting object on which I have blogged earlier.

It is the ascend module of a 1972 failed Soviet Venera probe, meant to land on Venus but stuck in Earth orbit after its apogee kick engine failed to push it into Heliocentric orbit towards Venus in 1972. This is the video from (a part of) the May 7 pass of this object:




The object on the video, at that time at an altitude of about 1640 km and range of 1845 km, is about 1 meter large and weighs 495 kg. It should look like this:

photo: NASA. Click to enlarge

The photo above is not Kosmos 482 itself, but an exhibit replica of a sister ship, the Venera 8 landing module in its protective shell. Venera 8 was launched four days before Kosmos 482, and unlike the latter it was successful and did reach Venus.

The failed Kosmos 482 probe still in Earth orbit was launched from Baikonur on 31 March 1972, and put in a highly elliptical 220 x 9200 km parking orbit around Earth. It's apogee kick engine next failed to push it into a heliocentric orbit towards Venus, and the spacecraft then broke up into four pieces.

Three of these four pieces have already reentered, the fourth, that is believed to be the landing module in its protective shell, is still on-orbit and is the object I imaged. It's apogee altitude has been lowering significantly since 1972.  The object will probably reenter somewhere around late 2025 or early 2026: I wrote an extensive blog post about it including a lifetime simulation a year ago.

The diagram below is from that post and shows the observed orbital decay up to March 2019, and the future decay (light blue) that I modelled with GMAT:

click diagram to enlarge

The interesting thing is that the Kosmos 482 Descent Craft might survive reentry largely intact! It is, after all, a lander that was meant to survive ascend through the thick atmosphere of Venus. It's parachute system will probably no longer function (so it will impact rather than land), but we can expect the hardware to reach Earth surface largely intact.

From a Space Heritage point of view, both this and its history makes this 48-year-old piece of Soviet Space hardware a highly interesting object. This is material culture that represents humanities' babysteps in the exploration of other planets.

Which makes this an interesting object to image, from a "Space Archaeology" viewpoint, and an interesting object to keep an eye on the coming years, until it reenters about six years from now.



Added Note,  9 May 2020 13:30 UT:

In response to my statement that the object likely is the lander in its enclosing protective shell, several people have pointed me to telescopic imagery that purportedly would show that a part of the main bus is still attached.

I (and many others in the amateur satellite community - we had a heated discussion on it on the Satobs list a few years ago) distrust imagery of this kind. This is imaging at the edge of resolution, in this case also notably from a non-stable imaging platform (handtracking a moving object at the limit of resolution!). It unfortunately includes cherrypicking frames. It is very difficult to objectively determine what is real detail and what is artefact of the imaging procedure. It is easy to overinterpret.

I also want to note that taking the mass and dimension of the lander only, actually give a very good fit to the observed orbital decay.