 |
| X-37B. Photo: USAF |
If there is one classified space object that speaks to the public's imagination, then it is the US Air Force's
X-37B robottic space plane, also known as
Orbital Test Vehicle (OTV). These 9 meter long uncrewed spacecraft have wings, with a wingspan of 4.5 meter, and look like a mini Space Shuttle. They are launched on a rocket like a normal satellite, but return to earth by landing like an airplane (or indeed like the Space Shuttles did). They have a payload bay of 2.1 by 1.2 meter in which they carry experiments and from which they could perhaps also release and retrieve small satellites. They are launched in very low orbits, between 250 and 450 km orbital altitude (i.e. generally below the orbit of the ISS).
The US Air Force has two X-37B's and is
currently flying it's 5th OTV
mission with one of them, with 685 days on orbit on the day of writing.
The winged design and the coloquial 'space plane' lead many people to think the X-37B flies and banks like an airplane or a Star Wars X-wing fighter while in space -
its infamous purported "manoeuverability", a notion recently fuelled again by
remarks of former SecAF Heather Wilson (see below).
This is mostly a misunderstanding and part of the mythos that surrounds the X-37B:
in space, the wings of the X-37B are useless and it behaves and orbits the earth like any other satellite. The X-37B does not change its orbital plane at a whim - or at least not generally. That is quite clear from amateur monitoring of the five OTV missions so far.
In this post I will show that the only significant manoeuvers the OTV's make are frequent alterations of their orbital altitude: they do not significantly change orbital plane during a mission. Periodically changing orbital altitude is something other satellites do too, so the X-37B is not special in this either, except that during recent OTV missions the X-37B's have done this more often than ordinary satellites typically do. And let me add, so you understand me well:
you don't need (or indeed use) wings for that. These orbital altitude changes are done with an engine burn, just like 'normal' satellites do.
The X-37B OTV 5 filmed by the author on 26 June 2019
The wings of the X-37B are not for manoeuvering in space, but primarily for use in the lower atmosphere upon its return to earth, when it lands like an aircraft (as the Space Shuttle did). Yet every now and then, the myth of the supposed wing-supported "manoeuverability" pops up again, and connected to it is a whole ecosystem of suspicions and theories about the potential "function" of the X-37B -
most notoriously the (almost certainly incorrect) notion that it is some kind of "Space Bomber" ready to be flown to any target on earth within 90 minutes to drop a destructive weapon. The Space Treaty, to which the USA is a signatory, prohibits to deploy weapons from space, and it is really unlikely that the X-37B is such a 'space bomber'.
The X37-B instead likely is a testbed for new space hardware, testing new technologies under real space conditions and then returning them to earth for inspection. We know for example that
during the OTV 4 mission, a XR-5a Hall-effect thruster was tested. The frequent changes in orbital altitude are part of this: testing space hardware under various drag regimes.
So what about that "manoeuverability" then? New fuel was fanned on the idea of extraordinarily "manoeuverability" recently
by intriguing statements made by former SecAF Heather Wilson. She claimed that the X-37B:
"Can do an orbit that looks like an egg and, when it's close to the Earth, it's close enough to the atmosphere to turn where it is. [...] Which means our adversaries don't know -- and that happens on the far side of the Earth from our adversaries -- where it's going to come up next. And we know that that drives them nuts."
Two things are apparently being claimed here:
(1)
The X-37B can manoeuvre by briefly dipping into the upper atmosphere;
(2)
This makes the X-37B difficult to track.
The wording of the statement is wonderfully opaque, but Wilson seems to suggest that the X-37B can seriously change its orbital inclination by briefly dipping into the upper atmosphere and using its wings to manoeuvre.
I have two problems with this. One is that bringing the X-37B down into the upper atmosphere by an engine burn (there is no other way), have it change orbital plane by using the wings, and then do a burn to get back to orbital altitude again, probably costs as much fuel as a more regular on-orbit engine burn to change orbital plane. So where is the gain in using this dip-and-wing-manoeuvre?
The other problem I have, is that
I do not see the claimed behaviour in our tracking data. Contrary to the impression that Wilson is trying to give us, i.e. that the X-37B's are difficult to track due to the tricks they perform, the X-37B OTV missions have been regularly tracked by our amateur network. And we do not see significant changes in the orbital plane during a given OTV mission.
 |
| The X-37B OTV 5 imaged by the author in April 2018 (click to enlarge) |
|
|
Looking at the tracking data we have for these X-37B missions, they show
only very minor changes in orbital inclination during a given mission.
There is
no evidence for sudden, significant changes in the orbital
plane, as is illustrated by these diagrams that for each OTV mission plots the orbital inclination against time (the data are from observations by the satobs amateur network):
The only exception appears to be mission OTV 4, which does show a temporary change in orbital
inclination and then back again in the last quarter of 2016. The orbital plane change
is of little significance however (only 0.6 degrees) and could have been done by a normal engine burn. So if the X-37B indeed can use a drop
into the upper atmosphere to make use of it wings to significantly
change orbital plane, they so far do not seem to have clearly demonstrated this capability.
(the changes in orbital inclination at the end of the OTV 2 and OTV 3 missions, probably are in preparation for landing).
What the X-37B missions in contrast do have demonstrated, especially during the last two missions, are
repeated changes in orbital altitude and orbital eccentricity (in Wilsons words: it "
can do an orbit like an egg"). This is illustrated by these plots of the apogee and perigee altitudes against time for the five OTV missions so far:
As I already mentioned this is something other satellites do too, so the X-37B is not particularly special in
this either,
except that during recent OTV missions the X-37B's do this more often than ordinary satellites typically do. The changes in orbital altitude probably are related to testing equipment under different drag, gravity and irradiation regimes.
So the X-37B missions so far set themselves apart from regular satellite missions by their low orbital altitudes and frequent changes in orbital altitude (in which the wings play no role at all). They can do so because their missions are relatively short compared to a typical satellite mission. Unlike a regular satellite, at one point they will land and be refuelled, and then relaunched after a while.
But as intriguing as the suggestions are,
the orbital history of the five X-37B OTV missions so far do not evidence the alledged manoeuverability in orbital plane.
Nor of course, are the X-37B that difficult to track as is claimed. Our amateur network regularly observed and observes the OTV missions. We might lose the OTV for a (usually brief) moment when it has made a manoeuvre to a higher or lower orbit, but a plane scan is enough to relocate it (and as the diagrams above show, they do not manoeuvre daily or even weekly).
So Wilson's remarks appear to be just part of the myth-making around the X-37B.
