(This post has been a while in the making. Due to various reasons, including the 21 Sept fireball, I did not come to write it up on this blog until now. The same analysis however was earlier presented as a Twitter-thread, on 23 September)
 |
| "I love the smell of UDMH in the morning..." (photo: KCNA) |
Over the past months, I have spent a number of posts on North Korea's recent increasingly bold missile tests.
The latest of these tests happened on September 14 (local September 15 in North Korea). At
21:57 UT that day, North Korea launched a Hwasong-12 IRBM from Pyongyang Sunan airfield towards the east-northeast. It crossed over Japan (causing air-raid alarms to go off) with, according to western military sources, a range of ~3700 km and apogee at 770 km, before impacting in the Pacific Ocean. The test was the second one to launch the Hwasong in a 'regular' rather than 'lofted' trajectory, over Japan.
I was abroad at the time of the test, meaning it was several days before I could look at this test and start an analysis. Some results were earlier presented on 23 September as
a Twitter-thread.
 |
| photo: KCNA |
As part of the propaganda photographs published by KCNA following the test, there was (just like after the test of 29 August) a picture of Kim Jong Un sitting behind a desk, with a map in front of him.
As was the case for August 29, the map shows a missile trajectory, presumably the trajectory aimed for in this test:
 |
| photo: KCNA |
I obtained a high resolution version of this photograph for analysis with the much appreciated help of
Ankit Panda. First, I roughly squared this image using the skew-tools in Photoshop:
Next, I
georeferenced this image against an actual map using
QGIS. The resulting map is the one below (the map projection I have used is a
Lambert azimuthal equal area projection centered on Sunan. The grid is WGS84). :
 |
| click map to enlarge |
The result of this georefencing is that the drawn trajectory starting at Sunan ends at approximately
39.60 N, 168.05 E. The range from Sunan to this impact location is
3615 km.
Note that I have added, in yellow, country outlines to the map to show the validity of the georeferencing. I also added a few annotations. I have added an STK-modelled ballistic trajectory to the map as a dashed red line: it is highly similar to the original trajectory line drawn on the map, as you can see, with apogee position corresponding to what appears to be a text in red on the map: what was depicted on Kim Jong Un's map hence appears to be a real ballistic trajectory.
The resulting range of 3615 km is close enough to the range reported by Western military sources (
about 3700 km) to conclude that the 14 September test went
much as intended.
This is
a difference with the 29 August test. In that case, the map showed a ~3300 km range while western military sources said the actual range flown was ~2700 km: it also flew more north than the trajectory that was depicted on the 29 August map. See
my earlier blog post here. The match for the 14 September test might indicate that
the 29 August test perhaps did not go as intended.
The map below shows both trajectories: that of 29 August
as depicted on Kim Jong Un's map (i.e.
not the actually flown trajectory!), and that of 14 September as depicted on Kim Jong Un's map:
 |
| click map to enlarge (map by author) |
It is interesting to look at the range distances for both tests. The range distances of 3316 km and 3615 km ring a bell. The distance from Pyongyang Sunan (the launch location) to Henderson AFB on Guam is ~3415 km. The August 29 map trajectory falls almost exactly 100 km short of that range, while the September 14 trajectory almost exactly 200 km overshoots this range.
I am going back-and-forth on whether this is significant or not. I tend to think that all these kind of map images released are intentional propaganda meant to convey a message: the map is meant to be analysed and "read" by the West.
As an illustration of how it potentially could be read: would we change the launch directions so that they would be towards Guam, then this (the two black crosses) would be the result in terms of the pattern of impact locations relative to Guam:
Remember that North Korea has "threathened" to conduct a quadruple demonstration with four missiles impacting in international waters in an 'envelope' around Guam, if the Trump administration does not stop B1 bomber demonstration flights from Guam. Do we see some kind of test mock enactment for this here? Is the message: "We are already practising for this, imperialist barking dottard dog!".
It would become very interesting
if North Korea were to launche two other missiles the coming month, and the pattern where they (were implied to) land relative to the earlier two tests might be very interesting.
 |
| photo: KCNA |
(I thank Ankit Panda for his help with obtaining a high resolution version of the photograph with Kim Jong Un and the map)
